From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 11 20:21:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC71216A407; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF6343D7C; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:21:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C541A3C19; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D922F515EB; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:21:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:21:54 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: G?bor K?vesd?n Message-ID: <20061011202154.GA22728@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <6bcc7a470610111231g67186cc0n687a96bd4d808bb5@mail.gmail.com> <20061011194027.GA22001@xor.obsecurity.org> <452D50C0.8040403@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <452D50C0.8040403@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Rob , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Is OpenNTPD better than the included NTPD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:21:57 -0000 On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:14:56PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:31:47PM -0400, Rob wrote: > > > >>I don't plan on allowing anyone to connect to my machine or use it as > >>a NTPD server. I see that OpenNTPD (OpenBSD's version) by default > >>doesn't listen on any IP/port and seems a little more secure. Is this > >>a good one to use over the included one in FreeBSD, or is there > >>something better? > >> > > > >How are you going to run an NTP server that doesn't listen on any > >IP/port? > > > >Kris > > > He might want to use it only for syncing, but ntpd also has such sort of > function irrc. Anyway, OpenNTPD can do privilege separation, that ntpd > can't, I don't know about another difference in the functionality. > Personally, I use OpenNTPD from ports and I'm satisfied with it. I misread and thought he was asking for a server. Kris