Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:25:39 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error: Illegal operands: There are only 32 single precision f registers; [0-31] Message-ID: <20050122002539.GB40959@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20050119233022.GA12519@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041114230005.GH90701@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041122123721.A19023@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20041211213312.GA27900@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041211232225.C64141@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20041212022747.GA77070@dragon.nuxi.com> <20050119233022.GA12519@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:30:22PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 06:27:47PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 11:22:25PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 01:33:12PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:37:21PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:00:05PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > A number of ports are failing on sparc64 with the following error: > > > > > > Error: Illegal operands: There are only 32 single precision f registers; [0-31] > > .. > > > > > The patch at: > > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/opcodes/sparc-opc.c.diff?r1=1.9&r2=1.10&cvsroot=src > > > > > fixes these and doesn't break world. Binutils 2.15 were branched with > > > > > rev. 1.9 of sparc-opc.c so I think it's fairly safe to import rev. 1.10 > > > > > onto the vendor branch in FreeBSD. > > > > > > > > Any progress in getting this fixed in FreeBSD? > > > No, no reply or reaction from David so far. > > > > I didn't see this until now (no PR filed :-( ). I just merged the FSF > > mainline fix into the FSF 2.15 repo. I've created a patch to test that > > updates src/contrib/binutils to the top of the FSF 2.15 tree. > > Can we get the patch referenced above committed to FreeBSD? As you > know, the binutils update you sent me was broken, but applying only > the redhat patch fixed the problem, and I still have it in my sparc64 > source trees so that packages can be built. I never heard that the Red Hat version of the patch fixed your problems. I need to investigate the differences as the patch I sent you is what is in the real binutils CVS and what will get committed to FreeBSD soon. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050122002539.GB40959>