From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun May 18 19:57:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA28205 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 18 May 1997 19:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caipfs.rutgers.edu (root@caipfs.rutgers.edu [128.6.155.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA28198 for ; Sun, 18 May 1997 19:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from darkwing.rutgers.edu (darkwing.rutgers.edu [128.6.111.4]) by caipfs.rutgers.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA04982; Sun, 18 May 1997 22:57:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: (davem@localhost) by darkwing.rutgers.edu (8.8.4/8.6.9) id WAA16061; Sun, 18 May 1997 22:57:25 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 May 1997 22:57:25 -0400 Message-Id: <199705190257.WAA16061@darkwing.rutgers.edu> From: "David S. Miller" To: terry@lambert.org CC: deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org, terry@lambert.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jb@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au In-reply-to: <199705190241.TAA23225@phaeton.artisoft.com> (message from Terry Lambert on Sun, 18 May 1997 19:41:17 -0700 (MST)) Subject: Re: GNAT-pthreads integration bugs/questions Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk From: Terry Lambert Date: Sun, 18 May 1997 19:41:17 -0700 (MST) > Put it at the bottom on the threads stack... There is no threads stack in an rfork. A thread lacks a stack with rfork(), is this what you are saying? How in the world does this work?