Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:54:45 +0000
From:      Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To:        839273@gmail.com
Cc:        Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>, Andres Perera <andres.p@zoho.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Backtick versus $()
Message-ID:  <AANLkTimR%2BPY6vWUOpz67V9wM7Sy2-OxaBw-tMFh3Q-LQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimxXKXt7GNZ%2Bg2beOf%2BP_e1gxHr1=WWdR0Nr557@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTinu1KB=Lz7rsH5TiZXHr61gH8AWFP=quJ9=8iJH@mail.gmail.com> <20110224232404.GA13838@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTik0r5skC0vn0OAGX1_MQDMdsrTK3943iF_rwNzD@mail.gmail.com> <20110225002644.GA14159@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTikBAtV-Yav0oxGaGejmbSdRN4Q3XDCdtdBWBSoP@mail.gmail.com> <20110225010037.GA25929@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <AANLkTimb2dbn8ufyzFharRcFTnhpSGQxcm03FFMgMRhV@mail.gmail.com> <20110225013140.GC14304@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTikD7S8VjQoPwqmiZ8sS-vvfq3Nzk%2B83AKm7UhBr@mail.gmail.com> <20110225021223.GA14459@guilt.hydra> <20110225022430.GA14682@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTimxXKXt7GNZ%2Bg2beOf%2BP_e1gxHr1=WWdR0Nr557@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 February 2011 02:55, Andres Perera <andres.p@zoho.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote:
>> I apologize for the grammaticall brokenness of that sentence.
>
> maybe you should spam the hundreds of subscribers of this mailing list with
> this line:
>
> s,grammaticall,grammatical,
>
>
> jesus christ, you're such a friggen noob

Before you criticise another's spelling/grammar, perhaps you could
learn where the Shift key is.

Also, some quotes from you (spot the errors):

and tcsh is inferior to mksh in everyway

tcsh built uppon that code instead of basing [wow, two in the same sentence]

been consistently argueing against the opposite

a buncha noobs is what you both are [paira perhaps]


Normally it's considered bad form to attack another's use of language,
but you lose that protection if you pick on others' QWC.

By the way, there's no such thing as a 'strawman', and perhaps you
could read about ad hominem arguments [1] and how you automatically
lose any arguments where you bring them in.

Chris

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimR%2BPY6vWUOpz67V9wM7Sy2-OxaBw-tMFh3Q-LQ>