From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Feb 15 3:39:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40904335 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 03:39:38 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id DAA97828; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 03:40:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 03:40:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200002151140.DAA97828@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Marinos J. Yannikos" Subject: Re: kern/16318: Fix for wrong interface when adding new routes Reply-To: "Marinos J. Yannikos" Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/16318; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Marinos J. Yannikos" To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, william.a@carrel.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/16318: Fix for wrong interface when adding new routes Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 12:45:41 +0100 This fixed a big problem for me. I had been wondering why it wasn't possible to have the default gateway in a different (but connected) network. This should be in the released kernel! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message