From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 12 09:57:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239CF16A4DD for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mv@thebeastie.org) Received: from p4.roq.com (ns1.ecoms.com [207.44.130.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BCF43D5A for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:57:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@thebeastie.org) Received: from p4.roq.com (localhost.roq.com [127.0.0.1]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F014CD84; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:57:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (ppp157-158.static.internode.on.net [150.101.157.158]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4357C4CD73; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:57:26 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <44B4C782.2@thebeastie.org> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:57:22 +1000 From: Michael Vince User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060526 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Hennessy References: <001801c6a4e9$2f8bbca0$0a00a8c0@thebeast> In-Reply-To: <001801c6a4e9$2f8bbca0$0a00a8c0@thebeast> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PF firewall rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:57:28 -0000 Greg Hennessy wrote: > > > >>I did mention it a few times but I suppose I wasn't clear >>about it, but I really do want to use "single line firewall >>rules", and the only way to do this is to keep state, if >>there are other ways/rules to have really flexible firewall >>but still with stateful inspection with a small amount of >>rules I would like to see them. >> >> > >Yes, RTFMP on tag and tagged. > > > While I can give you the benefit of the doubt that in some way you are trying to help I would prefer it if you just didn't respond to me. Your your comments are really abrasive,over the top and lacking of useful nature. This is a mailing list on PF for help and information exchange not a place to say RTFMP, and there is no argument that man pages are really just aimed for reference use for these who already familiar with what they need to do. Mike