From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sun Jan  7 20:47:25 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F58E5C24B
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun,  7 Jan 2018 20:47:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [78.47.246.247])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2F8D78187
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun,  7 Jan 2018 20:47:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be
 forged))
 by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w07KlE7S061238
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
 Sun, 7 Jan 2018 21:47:14 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net
X-Envelope-To: 000.fbsd@quip.cz
Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4])
 by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w07KlADx010403
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
 Mon, 8 Jan 2018 03:47:10 +0700 (+07)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Subject: Re: 'pkg upgrade -f spamassassin' stops but doesn't restart spamd
To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Michael Grimm <trashcan@ellael.org>, 
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <76627A89-D7E9-4010-910B-5F25886E7E7E@ellael.org>
 <5A523873.2050001@quip.cz> <5A524855.2040901@grosbein.net>
 <5A5284CC.9050400@quip.cz>
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
Message-ID: <5A528749.9070308@grosbein.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 03:47:05 +0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5A5284CC.9050400@quip.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, LOCAL_FROM, RDNS_NONE
 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 *      [score: 0.0000]
 *  1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
 *  2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2018 20:47:25 -0000

08.01.2018 3:36, Miroslav Lachman wrote:

>> There IS consensus on modifying config files while upgrade and it is written in our Porter's Handbook:
>> only unmodified files may be changes with upgrade. Any other behaviour is a bug that should be fixed.
> 
> If it is that simple then tell me how it is possible that for many years there are repetitive discussions
> and many ports with many commits violating this "rule"?

Because:

1) People are lazy and make errors creating ports violating Porter's handbook instructions;
2) People are lazy and do not create formal Problem Reports even when they are annoyed
hoping that SomeOne (TM) would do that for them.

Where are your PRs?