From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Mar  2 13:55:09 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA05321
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:55:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA05315
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA06808; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199703022154.NAA06808@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
cc: ejs@bfd.com (Eric J. Schwertfeger), jmb@freefall.freebsd.org,
        jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Mar 1997 16:48:07 EST."
             <199703022148.QAA10985@crh.cl.msu.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 13:54:58 -0800
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>From The Desk Of Charles Henrich :
> >> Now if we can convince bror@sms.fi to overclock his dual pentium and get h
im
> >> the new client we may be able to beat the dual 400mhz alpha 8)
> >
> > If you check the stats page, you'll notice he just changed his listing
> > from 606k keys/sec to 676k keys/sec, so he has the updated binary.  The
> > wonders of mime attachments :-)
> 
> I see how you are Amancio!  Did you single user a nice -20 to get 396? :)
> 

Nope, I took out a few transistor that I didn't need on my PPRO 8)

No, I just recompile the binary without -m486 and added -finline-functions.

	Cheers,
	Amancio