From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 16 02:53:10 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1345210DB3F6 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:53:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.zefox.org", Issuer "www.zefox.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70DAE750ED for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9G2RX5a053992 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 19:27:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9G2RXuD053991; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 19:27:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 19:27:33 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: bob prohaska Subject: Missing globaladdr implementation for www/webkit2-gtk3 Message-ID: <20181016022733.GA53961@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:53:10 -0000 In trying to compile numerous ports on an RPI3 that depend on www/webkit2-gtk3 the process stops with errors along the lines of DerivedSources/JavaScriptCore/LLIntAssembly.h:1349:2: error: Missing globaladdr implementation #error Missing globaladdr implementation Both the system and ports tree are current. The make command is simply make -DBATCH Is there a workaround? Thanks for reading, bob prohaska