From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 22 15:30:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kci.kciLink.com (kci.kciLink.com [204.117.82.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1517537C320 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:30:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kcilink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [204.117.82.2]) by kci.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F40AE897; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:30:19 -0500 (EST) Received: (from khera@localhost) by onceler.kcilink.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA30347; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:30:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from khera@kci.kcilink.com) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14553.22411.265795.429126@onceler.kcilink.com> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:30:19 -0500 (EST) To: Warner Losh Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "dangerously dedicated" In-Reply-To: <200003222301.QAA34410@harmony.village.org> References: <14552.57732.739752.665443@onceler.kcilink.com> <4.3.2.20000321160347.00ad9b20@207.227.119.2> <38D50DBC.88FA8E4D@glue.umd.edu> <38D3AB72.366D851D@glue.umd.edu> <200003152159.OAA89926@harmony.village.org> <38D03E64.3D17FC34@glue.umd.edu> <200003190433.VAA04863@harmony.village.org> <200003212255.PAA26291@harmony.village.org> <200003222301.QAA34410@harmony.village.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 8) "Bryce Canyon" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "WL" == Warner Losh writes: WL> I didn't say that using da0a is stupid. I said using dangerously WL> dedicated mode is stupid. Based on the number of times I've shot I guess I don't see how to use, eg, da0a without being "dangerously dedicated". When I did my install of FBSD 3.3, the partitioning process asked if I was sharing the disk or not. I said no, so it took over the entire disk, but I still get the long-sliced names like /dev/wd0s1a rather than the /dev/wd0a I'd expect since there is only one slice on the whole disk. My zip drive uses /dev/da0a after I did a newfs on it, though. WL> FreeBSD lets you do this as well. Are you sure that Linux doesn't WL> require fdisk disks? Linux/i386 doesn't have another form of disk Linux requires it to run, but doesn't hang forever if it doesn't exist. FreeBSD is the only system I've encountered so far that will lock up (ie, does not respond to any keyboard requests or terminate its probe) when scanning a disk without an FDISK table. I needed to use freedos to add one to this particular drive. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-301-545-6996 PGP & MIME spoken here http://www.kciLink.com/home/khera/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message