Date: 17 Jun 2002 22:32:39 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: "Mike A. Oligny" <pandaro@freebsd.schema.ca> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: gaim-0.58 Message-ID: <1024367559.17203.15.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <200206171750.37541.pandaro@freebsd.schema.ca> References: <20020616215705.58252.qmail@web10701.mail.yahoo.com> <3D0D0CD0.600ED02E@FreeBSD.org> <1024267197.98971.14.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200206171750.37541.pandaro@freebsd.schema.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-CoVxNoGQW2XkcQ5ixElA Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2002-06-17 at 19:50, Mike A. Oligny wrote: > On June 16, 2002 04:39 pm, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sun, 2002-06-16 at 18:10, Doug Barton wrote: > > > Michael Beattie wrote: > > > > Hello, I am am using the gaim port version 0.58. > > > > I was just wondering why, when it is installed and > > > > run, it needs to launch the gnome panel? > > > > > > This is a bug. Please file a PR. > > > > I don't think so. gaim can and will use the GNOME framework if > > available. It's best to build WANT_GNOME ports with WITHOUT_GNOME just > > to make sure you're not accidentally pulling in all the GNOME > > dependencies. In fact, if you do: >=20 > Yes! If I remember correctly, gaim port installed ghostscript, a large c= hunk > of gnome, cups, etc. Perhaps I'm exaggerating. >=20 > I've whined about this in the past - it can be very frustrating when I de= cide > to try something new - make install distclean, and come back to find X on > a server, or some fancy desktop environment worth several gigs installed > on my workstation. I try to always read the Makefile, but... >=20 > Personally, I think make.conf should include WITHOUT_X11 and stuff > like that by default - or perhaps these ports that like to install massiv= e=20 > lists of dependencies (Linux, X, KDE, Gnome, whatever) could all=20 > abide by a single WE_DON'T_WANT_IT flag? :) >=20 > And because I have a feeling this isn't going anywhere any time soon, > is there an easy way to back out a port and all of its dependencies > that are not being used by other ports? You can certainly use the portupgrade tool, pkg_deinstall to this recursively: pkg_deinstall -Rf gaim Joe >=20 > -Mike >=20 >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message >=20 >=20 --=-CoVxNoGQW2XkcQ5ixElA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA9DpvGb2iPiv4Uz4cRAjm9AKCLq3Z7hdCeL6xZccBjkpUXquFEYQCgo7Y9 xNnH1rTKi9lVZz9AOZoxYqg= =9KSm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-CoVxNoGQW2XkcQ5ixElA-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1024367559.17203.15.camel>