From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 27 19:40:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513971065687 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A5D8FC17 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk27 with SMTP id 27so1866346qyk.13 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:40:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1EpIkNFBIec+w9bQjxzooGL4gAImvl2LGHvc78lxMgg=; b=ReQJWq25aPQog51wy7vCSuXL+iufezXCnWa2lyf7cJ7G72BYcvLQHTpb/dtUPpWmuc 0Zv0y0ATWsSqReeV88rN0tOcVHTlM+CVd7tHIligYlPbGns5zbSAycHdV0y9g8Ta6pOl 8GD6tlHwBrIpULQr4CcnKQHRenr7gzU0Usvbk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ujr24v1LYLJr4iTXG4jMqGqKLkBcitj2lnKdewOlCd2RT3HGzmCkZwbG7iZlc0kakd 4/aEO+3HiElEnUGdpHeATzWcdf/7Gc32wp3z7FnDHCfJgSmuxjnfHA/PHpKgw6J849AF lkhLG8m8ZPKWYUl5MJFV+agVfydpCrXK5wNXk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.64.160 with SMTP id e32mr2487542qci.217.1301254838093; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.235.7 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:40:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110327184837.GA36228@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <20110327184837.GA36228@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:40:38 +0400 Message-ID: From: Subbsd To: Erik Trulsson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why vim ports have personal KNOBS for options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:40:39 -0000 On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Erik Trulsson wr= ote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:19:44PM +0400, Subbsd wrote: >> Ive wanted to ask why the option of vim port has not yet been handed >> via dialog by default. Personally, to make them work, we must define >> WITH_OPTIONS=3Dyes in make.conf (or WITH_VIM_OPTIONS=3Dyes). Life withou= t >> it is so difficult ;) > > Because the maintainer of the vim port has a dislike for the OPTIONS > framework. > I expected to hear that just so happened historically. =F4ext question I ask only to satisfy my interest. What OPTIONS framework basically can someone not like it? =E3hat are the disadvantages compared to " grep define /usr/ports///Makefile "? Maybe the other of thousand maintainrs something not know about it?