From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 08:18:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CD416A4CE for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:18:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blade.rsc.cx (blade.rsc.cx [64.235.233.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA57543D5D for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:18:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from essgee@secure.xohost.com) Received: from SLEEK (adsl-66-159-204-245.dslextreme.com [66.159.204.245]) by blade.rsc.cx (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with SMTP id i828I33I039500 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 01:18:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from essgee@secure.xohost.com) Message-ID: <002601c490c5$6a44b020$9301010a@SLEEK> From: "SG" To: Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 01:18:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Bind/Netra t1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 08:18:56 -0000 I was wondering if anyone was experiencing any issues running bind 9.2.3 in chroot with fbsd 5.2.1, netra t105 512 ram. The problems I'm having is that the named process will use a lot of cpu at times 30%-90% but will normally run at 10%, and the memory usage will steadily increase over time until it starts eating into swap. The same configuration on a p3 1ghz with the same amount of ram will run flawlessly and use no more than 150 meg. The amount of domains this server is authoritative for is relatively small, a little over 200 and at peak will only do about 150 recursive queries per second. Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Andrew