From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Sep 12 09:45:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA18249 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Sat, 12 Sep 1998 09:45:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from phoenix.volant.org (phoenix.volant.org [205.179.79.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA18241 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 1998 09:45:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from patl@phoenix.volant.org) From: patl@phoenix.volant.org Received: from asimov.phoenix.volant.org ([205.179.79.65]) by phoenix.volant.org with smtp (Exim 1.92 #8) id 0zHsnj-0003SV-00; Sat, 12 Sep 1998 09:45:31 -0700 Received: from localhost by asimov.phoenix.volant.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id JAA27441; Sat, 12 Sep 1998 09:45:28 -0700 Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 09:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: patl@phoenix.volant.org Subject: Re: "Cacheable memory"?? To: Manar Hussain cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980912001114.00afd720@stingray.ivision.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > re: PII vs K6-2 > > We were makign the exact same decisions here and settled on the k6-2 as > more cost effective but lower likely top performance. The performance comparisions should change dramaticly later this year when AMD releases the K6-3 with on-chip L2 cache... (Or at least that's the rumor I've heard.) -Pat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message