Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 12:59:28 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 190649] [MAINTAINER] net-mgmt/isic: Fix build in 9.1 Message-ID: <bug-190649-13-YW2qZyTG0P@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-190649-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-190649-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190649 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Zander <riggs@FreeBSD.org> --- Sure, sorry for the delay. I do not understand the logic of this patch. Originally the port changed this constant in isic.h for OSVERSION higher than (but not including) 900000. This suggests it stopped building on "9.0-CURRENT after importing x86emu, a software emulator for real mode x86 CPU from OpenBSD."???[1] Now the patch says, we do not need it on 9.0 and 9.1-R, but we do need it since "9.1-STABLE after LIST_PREV() added to queue.h (rev 242893) and KBI change in USB serial devices (rev 240659)."[2] which does not seem related to the patch at all. So I don't quite understand for which OSVERSIONS we really need this patch. Do we need it on 9.1-R? On 9.2? 9.3? 10.0? 11-CURRENT? [1] https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/book.html#freebsd-versions [2] page as [1], but first functional change in the base system after branching of 9.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-190649-13-YW2qZyTG0P>