Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 May 2012 08:29:15 +0800
From:      Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com>
To:        George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Mirror of Raidz for data reliability
Message-ID:  <CAOfEmZhtxvNM3kiK5mvTZCxzkTiVWKt97yAudfaxFCnjbANQ0g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BdUSyrG-RFFjchEYfovbvORVBZNHes9r9MhhGG1d568cO-CwA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAOfEmZh8v5xbQqkJJ7ZKkan7Ho0FPNrXJ95S1WRpioDXVG6P7w@mail.gmail.com> <20120515102206.GA53750@psconsult.nl> <CAOfEmZiTkr9Xcj6J4FRBd4FzL1ztgEpytSAUc=wZ8DBJtXsH%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BdUSyrG-RFFjchEYfovbvORVBZNHes9r9MhhGG1d568cO-CwA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
George,


> If you have 2 machines then your best bet would be HAST.
>

So, why use ETHERNET if my Machine can see both JBOD?


> If you are worried about data replication you can always use lagg with
> 2 or more interfaces.


It is different than data replication. It is data protection.

Best Regards,
-- 
Marcelo Araujo
araujo@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOfEmZhtxvNM3kiK5mvTZCxzkTiVWKt97yAudfaxFCnjbANQ0g>