From owner-freebsd-java Mon Mar 11 0:17:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E66737B400 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 00:17:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:17:22 +0100 Message-ID: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FDA454@l04.research.kpn.com> From: "Koster, K.J." To: "FreeBSD Java mailing list (E-mail)" Subject: RE: 1.3.1p6 dies sigbus with threads Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:17:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear All, > > I took some time (can you say "was frustrated doing other things" :-) > to try and track this down a bit more. I modified my test program to > fire up a bunch of noise threads (much like what SeedGenerator does) > and it increased the likelihood of a core dump (to about 1 in > 5 instead > of 1 in 50). The stack trace is the same in all cases. The > annoying part > is, if I run in java_g, I don't get a core dump! I hate bugs > like that. > I have been running my stuff in java_g too. No more core dumps. Perhaps we should default to java_g? :-) For those who are looking to improve the port: I have core dumps available. Filing a PR is pointless, since I have no simple test program to reproduce this with. A PR would just rot. Kees Jan ===================================================== You can't have everything. Where would you put it? [Steven Wright] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message