From owner-freebsd-cluster Thu Jul 26 15: 2:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from elm.phenome.org (elm.phenome.org [194.153.169.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6BB37B406; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:02:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joshua@roughtrade.net) Received: from localhost (joshua@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) with ESMTP id f6QM26CC010975; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 23:02:06 +0100 Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 23:02:06 +0100 (BST) From: Joshua Goodall X-X-Sender: To: Alexander Leidinger Cc: , , , Subject: Re: Monitoring a FS with kevent (was: Re: Redundant setup on a budget??) In-Reply-To: <200107261742.f6QHgXv06426@Magelan.Leidinger.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Yes, you have to walk through the entire FS and request a notification > for every file or directory. But perhaps the developer (CCed) is able to > add the "monitor the entire FS for me" functionality in the kernel... The snapshot support in -current does just this for its own purposes. That is very much Kirk McKusicks' domain right now. Whether it could be leveraged into a remote replication facility, I don't know. Start at http://www.mckusick.com/softdep/index.html J To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message