From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 29 08:47:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27CB16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B203643D41
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:47:31 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from mux@freebsd.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920)
	id AA8CE5C7EA; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:47:31 +0200
From: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>
To: Arnvid Karstad <arnvid@karstad.org>
Message-ID: <20040429154731.GC700@elvis.mu.org>
References: <29380.195.204.81.3.1083237898.squirrel@ssl.speedroad.net>
	<20040429113726.GB700@elvis.mu.org> <20040429164945.5EAD.ARNVID@karstad.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040429164945.5EAD.ARNVID@karstad.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: problems compiling world in 5.2.1-pX?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:47:31 -0000

Arnvid Karstad wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:37:26 +0200 - Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > This particular warning with optimizations superior to -O has been fixed in
> > -CURRENT.  There are still other problems with high optimization levels
> > though.
> 
> 
> Altho the error was a syntax error not an optimization error....

Er, no.  The error wasn't even an error, it was a warning.  If it was a
syntax error, building with -O wouldn't work either.  The build stopped
because we're using -Werror to avoid regressions.  The fact that this
warning is only catched with high optimization levels could be considered
a bug in GCC.

Cheers,
Maxime