From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jul 30 18:18:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFA437B8C8; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 18:18:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA26643; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 18:18:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 18:18:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: A new kernel extension to deal with IP option packets In-Reply-To: <20000730104427.A28035@daemon.ninth-circle.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > We have designed and developed a new socket protocol family to support > IP option packets in BSD. It allows the users to intercept any IP option > packet (source routing, router-alert...) from socket interface. So users > can play fancy tricks with packets. Can't we do this already with ipfw and divert sockets? ipfw can already match IP packets containing options. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message