From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb  3 17:54:09 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4FB16A420;
	Fri,  3 Feb 2006 17:54:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CCD43D45;
	Fri,  3 Feb 2006 17:54:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged))
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k13Hp6Zi097097;
	Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:51:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:51:06 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20060203.105106.41729362.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: des@des.no
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no>
References: <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no>
	<20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
	<86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0
	(harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]);
	Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:51:10 -0700 (MST)
Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 17:54:09 -0000

From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav)
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100

> Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> writes:
> > The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII=
 CPUs, =

> > 512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something abou=
t the =

> > crosscompiler that is different?
> =

> Different CFLAGS perhaps?

These different CFLAGS have been a source of unending problems.  I've
broken the tinderbox build a couple of times when my LINT build worked
w/o hassle.  And I got grumped at it, even though I did everything
right.  Maybe we can build the interbox with a set of standard, well
known flags?

Warner