Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:34:05 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: pkg-plist strict enforcement starting Message-ID: <20050114213405.GA10065@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <20050114211206.GF1175@k7.mavetju> References: <20050113062739.GA28658@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0501131148520.25402-100000@pancho> <20050113180504.GA26064@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050114130404.250d6e26@apircalabu.dsd.ro> <20050114112918.GF69532@voodoo.oberon.net> <20050114211206.GF1175@k7.mavetju>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 08:12:06AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Maybe we need two additional @ commands for pkg-plist: > > - @dirrmifempty foo/bar > does do what "@unexec rmdir %D/foo/bar 2>/dev/null || true" does. > > - @rmifdifferent foo/bar foo/baz > does do what "@unexec cmp %D/foo/bar %D/foo/baz && rm %D/foo/bar" does. > > This way we > > - have an easy and consistent syntax for a difficult command > > - have less chance for errors (forgetting %D, && instead of ||) > > Comments? Sounds interesting, but I'd change @rmifdifferent to something like @rmconfig since it's used by config files in most cases. -Kirill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050114213405.GA10065>