From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 4 6:35: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com (bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com [155.208.254.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83EF37B42C for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 06:34:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hpcpbla.bri.hp.com (hpcpbla.bri.hp.com [15.144.112.65]) by bbnrel4.net.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC8E15CEB; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 15:34:40 +0200 (METDST) Received: from sse0691.bri.hp.com (sse0691.bri.hp.com [15.144.0.53]) by hpcpbla.bri.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 SMKit7.0) with ESMTP id OAA27340; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:34:38 +0100 (BST) Received: (from steve@localhost) by sse0691.bri.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA12946; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:37:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from steve) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:37:36 +0100 From: Steve Roome To: "Chad R. Larson" Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC bug with 4.1-stable Message-ID: <20000904143736.A12903@moose.bri.hp.com> References: <20000831133004.B90719@moose.bri.hp.com> <200008312111.OAA29206@freeway.dcfinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <200008312111.OAA29206@freeway.dcfinc.com>; from chad@DCFinc.com on Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 02:11:18PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 02:11:18PM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote: > As I recall, Steve Roome wrote: > > Yes, the actual problem seems to be "-mno-move -mcpu=pentiumpro", even > > with -O0 this will crash. [which gcc explaining it has crashed, not > > just some random sig11 that some git is going to argue is RAM > > related!] > > Have you launched this at the GCC folks? Yup. IIRC, it's optimization/496 (can't check at the moment though) > > The other problem is slightly odd : > > > > gcc -mno-ieee-fp -march=pentiumpro -c particlesys.c -o particlesys.o > > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 > > *** Error code 1 > > Signal 11 is a segmentation violation. Usually dereferencing an > uninitialized, null or trashed pointer. Yup, it's only seeming to happen with -mno-ieee-fp and pentiumpro options. So I guess there really is something screwy there. I'll file a pr for this. Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message