From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 13:11:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6688D16A41F; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:11:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fcreid@ourcorner.org) Received: from frad.org (66-208-209-61.cdnt02a.rtchrd01.md.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [66.208.209.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC0F43D73; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:11:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fcreid@ourcorner.org) Received: from MICRON by filenet.wwiv.net (MDaemon.PRO.v8.0.1.R) with ESMTP id md50000066605.msg; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:09:36 -0500 From: "Frank Reid" To: "'Boris Popov'" Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:09:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcXw7QmqgEEE6iTSRsyyRarsruqtwgAATRLgAAJh+mA= In-Reply-To: <016501c5f0ef$3a012250$d100a8c0@FRAD.ORG> X-Authenticated-Sender: fcreid@ourcorner.org X-HashCash: 1:20:051124:bp@freebsd.org::XL6PqoEbhfZ8VYlc:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002qp8 X-Spam-Processed: new.frad.org, Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:09:37 -0500 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-Return-Path: fcreid@ourcorner.org X-MDAV-Processed: new.frad.org, Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:09:37 -0500 Message-Id: <20051124131150.3BC0F43D73@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: 'Craig Rodrigues' , freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FW: mount_smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:11:56 -0000 On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:39:19AM -0500, Frank Reid wrote: > > > Try to backout rev 1.16 of sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_smb.c and tell me > > if this helps. This patch was heavily tested on NT-like machines but may > > break with w9x family. > > Unfortunately, just backing out that one change ("ctx->f_flags |= > SMBFS_RDD_EOF | SMBFS_RDD_NOCLOSE;") did not correct this problem. By the > way, I did mention that the W2K/XP machine shares still load and access > properly on the same machine, right? It's just this one Win ME machine > share that doesn't any longer. > Well, there wasn't any other major changes except one done by > Craig on Wed Nov 16 02:26:25 2005 UTC, which fits into "week or so". I don't > see right now how it can break ME machines. Hm, only if it inadvertently > changes order of some operations. I tried reverting to smbfs_vfsops.c 1.3.6, but after doing so all shares (including the W2K) refused to mount with an error "mount_smbfs: mount error: " so there must be more to it than just the single file. I wish I could be of more help on this for you. Frank