From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 12 01:50:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A2A26BA; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 01:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A3611717; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 01:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jre-mbp.elischer.org (ppp121-45-232-70.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.232.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s3C1nqgL005039 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:49:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <53489BBA.2040802@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:49:46 +0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Maste Subject: Re: Time for turning off gdb by default? Or worse... References: <20140408212629.GD21331@kib.kiev.ua> <5344B551.30200@freebsd.org> <534833E6.9070707@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arch X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 01:50:00 -0000 On 4/12/14, 4:35 AM, Ed Maste wrote: > On 11 April 2014 14:26, Julian Elischer >> bleagh! >> >> compare with ddd.. >> >> http://img.brothersoft.com/screenshots/softimage/d/data_display_debugger_for_mac-203841-1231223624.jpeg >> >> https://www.gnu.org/software/ddd/ for more examples > I'm not sure how that's relevant; we're not contemplating putting that > in the base system. > I'm suggestng that it's another way where gdb has features that lldb doesn't. A plethora of front-ends.