From nobody Sun Jan 28 09:31:03 2024 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TN5lj1MkMz58DKh for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 09:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from developer@lorenzosalvadore.it) Received: from mail-4022.proton.ch (mail-4022.proton.ch [185.70.40.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TN5lh55l7z4XbL; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 09:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from developer@lorenzosalvadore.it) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lorenzosalvadore.it; s=protonmail3; t=1706434269; x=1706693469; bh=yix1QTfF1PMsBZKzysr0S5EBb+t7KPvsUqUH0PDoNTk=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=hFxBPLls9VOD3KymZ+pvMctlXOjrf7N4S/WpQUs8hGWC8YScyN4FhoKWBg6HffYQK cv50aDIu7HG8Wmz5e9xZ48AbKKAKHxMq/BeoV8+YyOC0DvHf0iPwfmhZFzomxCLSYX 788Fmx86hvtlc9IH5zsrn3FASrBFLlz/7QjOaZ3feM4bIbFDorELiEMq6LD9U1qGS/ X3hynwlxgEVTrhDvhqCOLr2GqIa41Zz7Wt0Jc5f5P6xyUtEEjJuFB5Jl8zAFg8pwEr /Np2ty82NI72B9vg6/3LrmqN0qW0Ubedh0bjPHAYe7+WFaaiBAiDraZ/16ggYzB9jW Wr2r2wuqNfWJw== Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 09:31:03 +0000 To: Mathieu Arnold From: Lorenzo Salvadore Cc: Piotr Kubaj , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: git: b5724fc17272 - main - lang/gcc14-devel: fix build by bumping PORTREVISION Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <202401280232.40S2WG4E062597@gitrepo.freebsd.org> Feedback-ID: 53711648:user:proton List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TN5lh55l7z4XbL X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.40.0/24, country:CH] On Sunday, January 28th, 2024 at 09:42, Mathieu Arnold wr= ote: >=20 >=20 > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 08:07:35AM +0000, Lorenzo Salvadore wrote: >=20 > > Thanks, but this is not how you bump PORTREVISION with lang/gcc14-devel= : you need to define PORTREVISION as usual, which will append _1 to the end= of PKGVERSION as usual. > > Actually, I think the distfile won't even be fetched now. > > Now I will need to define PORTEPOCH to fix the issue. Not a big deal an= yway: GCC ports live long in the ports tree, but not forever. >=20 >=20 > So, as you pointed out, the port could not be built. >=20 > PORTEPOCH is there to allow our tools to know that a package's version > is newer than the one that is installed. >=20 > As the port could not be built, there could not have been a package with > the bogus PORTVERSION, so, bumping PORTEPOCH was not needed. >=20 > -- > Mathieu Arnold Oh sorry. Thanks for the explanation. I will remember it next time. Cheers, Lorenzo Salvadore