From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 21 00:34:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9088016A4CE for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:34:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from koti.synty.net (www.svk.fi [213.173.139.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B5443D1D for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:34:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from listat@synty.net) Received: by koti.synty.net (Postfix, from userid 565) id 44EF6AEA2A; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 03:34:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by koti.synty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44426B6954 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:34:28 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:34:28 +0200 (EET) From: VA To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: thanks - firewalling policy X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: VA List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:34:30 -0000 Thanks for the replies on this. After I had sent the message I realized that it was a kind of dumb one. Naturally rules must be used on all interfaces. I just got little overwhelmed ... the amount of interfaces requires to be extra careful. :-) Well I better get started or I never finish it. Interesting to see how it performs in production. -Vesa, SysAdmin