From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 15:50:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20401065675 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB03F8FC20 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m74Fo3pj013914 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m74Fo3kx013911; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:50:03 GMT Message-Id: <200808041550.m74Fo3kx013911@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jakub Jasinski Cc: Subject: Re: misc/126230: weird process cpu usage stats and weird load average X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jakub Jasinski List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:50:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR misc/126230; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jakub Jasinski To: Kris Kennaway Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/126230: weird process cpu usage stats and weird load average Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:52:08 -0400 No. I ran ktrace on the processes and ktrace.out was empty. Read my follow up message: I already had a lengthy conversation with Remko about this. NONE of the processes were running. The non-zero TIME is nonsense as well and only accumulated after rsync was left running. On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:34:44 +0200 Kris Kennaway wrote: > This shows that various processes have recently been running, > explaining the load average. You can also see that the same > processes that have non-zero WCPU have non-zero TIME, indicating that > they have accumulated CPU runtime. All of this is self-consistent > and points to the fact that you have processes running on your server. > > Kris