From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 22 09:15:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C043A16A4CE; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 09:15:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.Awfulhak.org (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [80.177.173.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276E343D46; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 09:15:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from dev.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.5]) by gw.Awfulhak.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i7M9FIeV075080; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:15:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:15:17 +0100 From: Brian Somers To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Message-Id: <20040822101517.1935e7d3@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: <53F72233A48EFF2AFE6728E6@aslan.scsiguy.com> References: <200408171812.i7HICbLM078769@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040819051134.7f088757@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> <70CFCC3FCF048C13F0ABFA7B@aslan.scsiguy.com> <20040821195714.232ea67f@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> <2EBB6525AF8622BD86E3D2C9@aslan.scsiguy.com> <20040821222914.04419f2d@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> <53F72233A48EFF2AFE6728E6@aslan.scsiguy.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on gw.lan.Awfulhak.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/isa psm.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 09:15:25 -0000 On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 21:51:52 -0600, "Justin T. Gibbs" wrote: > I'm not against further cleanups of moused and friends, but I would > like to know if the second change fixes the problem for you. Yes, the second change would certainly fix my scenario. Methinks these two scenarios are aimed at non-ps/2 mice as you're right - psm won't handle variable length packet sizes. Cheers. -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !