From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 24 16:20:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B347716A4B3; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A440543FE3; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:20:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bleez@comcast.net) Received: from gravy.homeunix.net ([68.81.196.221]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2003092423205501100olir4e>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:20:55 +0000 Received: from gravy.homeunix.net (gravy.homeunix.net [192.168.1.2]) by gravy.homeunix.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8ONKqtw008219; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:20:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bleez@comcast.net) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:20:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Bryan Liesner To: Thomas Quinot In-Reply-To: <20030924184206.GA43920@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> Message-ID: <20030924191529.H8200@gravy.homeunix.net> References: <1062861719.2761.35.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <1063763321.776.2.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <20030917070959.L458@gravy.homeunix.net> <1063847031.804.4.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <20030918193255.GB76387@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <20030924184206.GA43920@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Bryan Liesner Subject: Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:20:57 -0000 On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote: > Le 2003-09-19, Guillaume =E9crivait : > > > Thanks for the patch. cd0 is faster now and ATAPICAM works great. > > Are you going to commit the patch? > > DMA is now enabled for ATAPI/CAM i/o, as of atapi-cam.c rev. 1.26. > Thanks to all who tested and reviewed the change. > No, thank you! dd'ing a full data CD before this fix had top showing at least 50% of the CPU time in interrupt - it's now down to the usual 5% or less. -Bryan