From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 25 20:49:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCDA1065673 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 20:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE198FC19 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 20:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4PKnMCI031415; Fri, 25 May 2012 22:49:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q4PKZe5h031303; Fri, 25 May 2012 22:35:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 22:35:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Arthur Chance In-Reply-To: <4FBFB5E7.1050005@qeng-ho.org> Message-ID: References: <4FBF3EA9.2000103@esiee.fr> <4FBF8F38.9070300@qeng-ho.org> <4FBF9356.7040504@esiee.fr> <4FBF9BDF.4020208@qeng-ho.org> <4FBFA17A.7010906@esiee.fr> <4FBFB5E7.1050005@qeng-ho.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 25 May 2012 22:49:23 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Frank Bonnet , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Cloud" software ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 20:49:25 -0000 > > As he said in his post, NFS is the first place to start. It's available on > FreeBSD, Linux, Mac OS, other Unix derived systems, and Windows 7. The one > thing to be careful of is that it works best when you have all home > directories on central servers and all access is on client machines. It is i would strongly recommend serving windows clients with windows protocol (samba), it is just simple and works great > For earlier (< 7) Windows boxes, one possibility is running Samba on the Unix > servers. This would seem most natural to a Windows user as they merely have > to browse the network to find the shared file systems. With windows 7 samba still is far better. And with NFS you will not be able to enforce security without making separate filesystem for each user. > However, another possibility is running a WebDAV server that makes the home > directories visible. Windows (>= XP) can connect drive letters to WebDAV > servers, and there are also Android and iPhone apps that can access WebDAV. if really someone needs HTTP based file access (IMHO stupid) because phones require this i would rather set it up parallel to SAMBA and/or NFS > >