Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:04:47 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Subject: Re: Errors during Upgrade netpbm-10.26.64_4 to netpbm-10.35.80_2 Message-ID: <20110425220447.GE10901@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20110422122006.GA1682@elch.exwg.net> References: <20110422114116.GZ1553@albert.catwhisker.org> <20110422122006.GA1682@elch.exwg.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9l24NVCWtSuIVIod Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011-Apr-22 14:20:06 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net= > wrote: >THe current graphics/netpbm port does not compile if there's an older >version of netpbm installed - /usr/local/include/pm.h from the older >netpbm takes precedence over the port's lib/pm.h but misses some macros >(well, it's an upgrade...) as PM_GNU_PRINTF_ATTR(a, b) which then confuse >the compiler. Note that just deleting /usr/local/include/pm.h isn't enough to make netpbm-10.35.80_2 compile so there are more incompatibilities than that. >pkg_delete -f the old netpbm and re-install the port, worked for me. Followed by 'portmaster --check-depends' or equivalent to clean up the dangling dependencies. Since netpbm isn't solely a leaf port, I believe this warrants an entry in UPDATING. --=20 Peter Jeremy --9l24NVCWtSuIVIod Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk217/8ACgkQ/opHv/APuId1BgCfe+k8/5iStlD981hOShMsABho Dr8An3HK/YKqKgmliPejNBPHF4nG5aBG =FlJe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9l24NVCWtSuIVIod--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110425220447.GE10901>