From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 11 06:51:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B523B16A4DE for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A0D43D46 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:51:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94CF2086; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:51:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4FE2085; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:51:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 941C833C1F; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:51:54 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=E1clav?= Haisman References: <200607092136.k69LaNDX055391@www.freebsd.org> <84dead720607092015q7f1701abse143f3855c2aa95a@mail.gmail.com> <1152540567.99616@origin.intron.ac> <44B2AE69.4080703@elischer.org> <44B2D2DF.2000401@sh.cvut.cz> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:51:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <44B2D2DF.2000401@sh.cvut.cz> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?V=E1clav?= Haisman's message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:21:19 +0200") Message-ID: <86sll8zl9x.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, delphij@delphij.net, Julian Elischer , mag@intron.ac Subject: Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++ X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:51:59 -0000 V=E1clav Haisman writes: > Deciding that some features are bad beforehand, before you evaluate > them is IMO bad idea. Let interested people write a bunch of C++ > modules with the complete language before deciding on what shouldn't > be used. It's not that simple. The complete language requires a ton of support code which must be written and tested. Are you volunteering to do that? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no