From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 13 9:18:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from lily.ezo.net (lily.ezo.net [206.102.130.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE7437BF2E for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 09:18:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jflowers@ezo.net) Received: from lily.ezo.net (jflowers@localhost.ezo.net [127.0.0.1]) by lily.ezo.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA13806 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:17:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:17:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Flowers To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Sendmail mailertable vs virtusertable Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It looks like either of these features can be used to process email for virtual domains. For virtusertable domain names must be in the local domains (cw) table and for mailertable they must not. Both look like they can map to local and smtp users with either a unique or shared namespace. Are there any other differences that might suggest one approach over another? Which is preferred? Jim Flowers #4 ISP on C|NET, #1 in Ohio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message