From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Mar  4 15:31:46 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA20118
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 15:31:46 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA20052;
          Wed, 4 Mar 1998 15:31:31 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id PAA03788; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 15:30:34 -0800 (PST)
To: jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly)
cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, dyson@FreeBSD.ORG,
        chuckr@glue.umd.edu (Chuck Robey), current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Donations. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Mar 1998 14:07:29 GMT."
             <35025f98.6661194@mail.cetlink.net> 
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 15:30:34 -0800
Message-ID: <3784.889054234@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> If you can't see the value of meaningful donor incentives, someone
> else will.

Sigh.  Last round: An arbitrary and contraining system of votes does
not constitute a meaningful donor incentive.  It might give the donor
warm fuzzy feelings, but it's not meaningful in any real sense of the
word and for an explanation as to why, please see my earlier posting
on this topic.

Besides, you've already had a number of people tell you that they think
this is a bad idea and yet you persist in trying to ram it down our
throats.  That is not logical behavior.

					Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message