From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 15 22:03:31 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DDAB57C
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 22:03:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from olinguito.schwarzes.net (olinguito.schwarzes.net
 [IPv6:2a01:4f8:7d:1b5::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24D211A68
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 22:03:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from asc-t60.schwarzes.net (p5B031591.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
 [91.3.21.145]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by olinguito.schwarzes.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4FM3S9q017744
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 May 2015 00:03:28 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from freebsd.asc@strcmp.org)
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 00:03:15 +0200
From: Andreas Schwarz <freebsd.asc@strcmp.org>
To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Performance issues with raspberry pi 2
Message-Id: <20150516000315.45feccfca08f5235d26ea071@strcmp.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=9Mf9Dhfeb7iyXoJPpZWcBZ6uTREOmViZHr6v3odcMnA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOx9_ZiUw5nkBK=Bsumb=K2W1hv0P+NAwT7OXE7VAz_96awqOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3AB5ECCF20894591B4DF5FCBA8CA49BB@ad.peach.ne.jp>
 <CAOx9_Zg5WGUAvmmhAkUsgUM-H+p9MWzmWjHnXfKAAxFoEuwrLg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOx9_ZiZmmrSBkf1quzW-zkbW0nNg08rAAV__7FHRdCbTCzt-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-Vmo=9Mf9Dhfeb7iyXoJPpZWcBZ6uTREOmViZHr6v3odcMnA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (olinguito.schwarzes.net [78.47.41.143]);
 Sat, 16 May 2015 00:03:28 +0200 (CEST)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 22:03:31 -0000

On Fri, 15 May 2015 10:46:45 -0700
Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> What's sysctl dev.cpu.0 show? Does it correctly step the CPU up to 900MHz?

For "production equipment" it's recommended to use the powerd. Have a look 
at the recent posting from Daisuke Aoyama.

At the moment I'm a little bit afraid about the temperature when steping up 
manually to 900 MHz (and using all the cores). I've no cooling fan and don't 
want to use one.

-- 
best regards
Andreas