From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 2 13:08:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CE216A420 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 13:08:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hk@alogis.com) Received: from alogis.com (firewall.solit-ag.de [212.184.102.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70DA743D45 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 13:08:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hk@alogis.com) Received: from alogis.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alogis.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k22D8MXG095237; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:08:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hk@alogis.com) Received: (from hk@localhost) by alogis.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k22D8MSM095236; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:08:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hk) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:08:22 +0100 From: Holger Kipp To: Pete French Message-ID: <20060302130822.GA95048@intserv.int1.b.intern> References: <20060302041631.GA27435@ns.museum.rain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: stable@museum.rain.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New ports on older stable (4.11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:08:26 -0000 On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:41:28AM +0000, Pete French wrote: > > I still share a part of your trepidation about getting oneself into > > a bind with uncooperative dependencies, etc. However, I have had > > more success than I would have imagined. > > Thats good to hear. What I am intending to do is to backup the > whole ports tree, try and do the upgrade, and if it doesnt work > then just go and rebuild all the old ones instead. if you have the place to spare you might want to do this inside a chroot-environment - so if everything goes as expected, you have all the ports available as packages already, and if it doesn't you don't have to revert everything again... Regards, Holger Kipp