From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 16 18:03:26 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CD116A41B; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:03:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5973C13C4D3; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:03:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAGI31Ph034620; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:03:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <473DDB54.6050007@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:03:00 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070802 SeaMonkey/1.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <29732.1195235967@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <29732.1195235967@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:03:02 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= , Nate Lawson Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata atapi-cd.c atapi-cd.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:03:26 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <473DD94D.8050605@samsco.org>, Scott Long writes: > >>> The simplest way to do this, is probably to overload ENOENT or some >>> other currently undefined errno for this effect. >> But then why not have g_access be able to communicate the ability to >> access the device independent from the ability to access the media? >> Seems like both of these questions are "access" questions. > > Because that is a lot more work for no benefit I can see ? > Says the man who complains to others about doing things the Right Way and not adding hacks =-) Oh well. Scott