From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 6 13:02:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97AE1363; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 13:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (cl-1657.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:678::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4301A612; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 13:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id t36D21W6032529; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 06:02:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201504061302.t36D21W6032529@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 06:02:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: svn commit: r383422 - head/devel/protobuf-c To: danfe@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20150406125516.GA52241@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 13:02:13 -0000 On 6 Apr, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 12:51:37PM +0000, Don Lewis wrote: >> New Revision: 383422 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/383422 >> >> [...] >> -PORTNAME= protobuf-c >> -PORTVERSION= 1.1.0 >> -CATEGORIES= devel >> -MASTER_SITES= https://github.com/${PORTNAME}/${PORTNAME}/releases/download/v${PORTVERSION}/ \ >> - LOCAL/truckman/farsight >> +PORTNAME= protobuf-c >> +PORTVERSION= 1.1.0 >> +DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v >> +CATEGORIES= devel > > Any reason to break indentation in PORTNAME section? I understand the > ugliness of DISTVERSIONPREFIX, but it alone does not warrant repo churn > in the adjacent lines (think "svn blame"). Purely cosmetics. Point taken.