From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 28 09:37:58 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C6E16A405;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl)
Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (palm.hoeg.nl [83.98.131.212])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0F313C49D;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl)
Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 76CEC1CC78; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:37:56 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:37:56 +0100
From: Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <20070128093756.GS64263@hoeg.nl>
References: <e572718c0701150824o24d14ff8t4f42dbe1cd0314c6@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070124113858.GG64263@hoeg.nl>
	<200701241254.51900.hselasky@c2i.net>
	<20070127.192204.-862243883.imp@bsdimp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MhZKc0eW5aU1X1vX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070127.192204.-862243883.imp@bsdimp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:32:17 +0000
Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org,
	pietro.cerutti@gmail.com, hselasky@c2i.net
Subject: Re: atacontrol kernel crash (atausb?)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:37:58 -0000


--MhZKc0eW5aU1X1vX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> In message: <200701241254.51900.hselasky@c2i.net>
>             Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> writes:
> : Instead of having all these quirks, isn't it possible that the SCSI lay=
er can=20
> : auto-probe this?
>=20
> The short answer is no.  There's no reliable way to tell if a device
> supports a given scsi command, and some devices freak out (lock up)
> when sent one.

Well, in one of the scenario's there is. USB UFI devices never support
synchronize.

--=20
 Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl>
 WWW: http://g-rave.nl/

--MhZKc0eW5aU1X1vX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFvG7052SDGA2eCwURAoe7AJkBVMPbaliNAzvM3M7dW4ucRtAoZwCfbNc5
+jjy6M2SJeWB8/RxES3XEOc=
=euv/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--MhZKc0eW5aU1X1vX--