From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 18:06:59 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A6316A418 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:06:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6570C13C468 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:06:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5EF5191F for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:06:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:06:52 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070815190652.29880f43@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <18114.59908.527755.64532@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <46C20CB8.3010706@cam.ac.uk> <200708142245.l7EMjQ8o027148@smtpclu-2.EUnet.yu> <20070815083210.M54184@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <200708150810.l7F8AJEv032092@smtpclu-2.EUnet.yu> <18114.59908.527755.64532@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:06:59 -0000 On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:56:52 -0400 Robert Huff wrote: > > Nikola Lecic wrote: > > >> So the /etc/make.conf option is better. > > > > It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear > > in the Handbook. > > I try to avoid setting things in make.conf that do not need to > be set there. Why? Because - as far as I know - they will apply to > _everything_ that uses the standard "make" infrastructure. > Not if you define them conditionally as Roland suggested - portsconf is equivalent to this.