From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Feb 13  8:18:39 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9381F37B401
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:18:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com (sentry.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C769B43F85
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:18:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from amigus@tislabs.com)
Received: by sentry.gw.tislabs.com; id LAA09067; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:19:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from raven.gw.tislabs.com(10.33.1.50) by sentry.gw.tislabs.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma008999; Thu, 13 Feb 03 11:18:13 -0500
Received: (from amigus@localhost)
	by raven.gw.tislabs.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1DGHWi10543;
	Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:17:32 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:17:32 -0500
From: Adam Migus <amigus@tislabs.com>
To: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: usbd patch (MAXUSBDEV no more)
Message-ID: <20030213161732.GA10500@raven.gw.tislabs.com>
References: <20030213160229.GA9742@raven.gw.tislabs.com> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030213111244.26353B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030213111244.26353B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Me too, so if it does require one someone please tell me.  I obviously
read the code and from my understanding no locking is fine but I
could be wrong.

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:13:31AM -0500, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
> 
> :This patch makes usbd track a dynamic number of devices using a list
> :instead of the static array of 4 devices.  It's implemented as a list
> :but it's very easy to change.
> 
> Does this list want a lock to protect it?  I am unfamiliar with usb
> locking at the moment, so ignore if stupid.
> 
> Cheers,
> Andrew
> 
> --
> Andrew R. Reiter
> arr@watson.org
> arr@FreeBSD.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message