From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 25 18:16:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41EF106564A for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:16:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7175E8FC15 for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-255-48-78.bredband.comhem.se ([83.255.48.78]:50798 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LxmB7-0006Fq-5s for current@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:00:44 +0200 Received: (qmail 70462 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2009 20:00:35 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2009 20:00:35 +0200 Received: (qmail 87192 invoked by uid 1001); 25 Apr 2009 20:00:35 +0200 Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:00:35 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Wes Morgan Message-ID: <20090425180035.GA87140@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Originating-IP: 83.255.48.78 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1LxmB7-0006Fq-5s. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1LxmB7-0006Fq-5s da4dfdfcf259e0dfe2754700996cc604 Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: COMPAT_FREEBSDn X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:16:03 -0000 On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:25:28PM -0500, Wes Morgan wrote: > The various COMPAT_FREEBSDn options are part of generic, but are they > needed for most users? Do they enable some structures or interfaces that > some userland programs still expect, or is it safe to disable them > assuming that I don't need to run binaries from older systems? If you are sure that you will never need to run binaries compiled for older systems, then the COMPAT_FREEBSD{4,5,6} options should be quite safe to remove. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se