Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:01:01 -0800 From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com> To: "Lars Engels" <lars.engels@0x20.net> Cc: "Matthias Apitz" <guru@unixarea.de>, <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless) Message-ID: <9995ff9c5e982933d4c0d821ddee4e62@udns.ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <20171207133307.GT19238@e.0x20.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:33:08 +0100 "Lars Engels" <lars=2Eengels@0x20=2Enet> said > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:14:44PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Sometimes I want to add some port which was not built with poudriere > > directly compiling it on the target laptops and now, ofc, this > > compilation is missing some other packages the concrete port is > > depending on and it tries to build them too, even if they are already a= s > > built package in my local repo=2E If I'm not lazy, I watch the building > > and when it goes to look in Internet for some additional source to > > build, I interrupt the 'make install' and look if I could install it fr= om > > the local repo=2E Boring=2E Can I direct the make process to look on the > > flight into the local repo to satisfy the needs of the compilation of > > the port? >=20 > You can in the port's directory you can run "pkg install -A `make missing= `=2E > That should install missing dependencies as packages=2E Sometimes there > are no packages for a dependecy then you can skip those: > "pkg install -A `make missing | grep -v -e fooport -e barport` and in case you haven't already done so; you'll also want to adjust pkg=2Econf(5) to point to your local repo=2E --Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9995ff9c5e982933d4c0d821ddee4e62>