Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:05:13 -0400 From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com> To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: restrict qualifier task Message-ID: <20021007150513.A11025@attbi.com> In-Reply-To: <20021006224711.C97120@espresso.q9media.com>; from mike@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 10:47:11PM -0400 References: <20021006214520.B97120@espresso.q9media.com> <20021006223653.A7728@attbi.com> <20021006224711.C97120@espresso.q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 10:47:11PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com> writes: > > On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 09:45:20PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > > > > > If someone's looking for an easy task to do, the following functions > > > are missing restrict type-qualifiers: For this task, is it better to use the C99 restrict keyword itself, or use the __restrict macro defined in <sys/cdefs.h>? statvfs() uses __restrict in the header file, but documents "restrict" in the man page. pselect() uses __restrict in the header file, but doesn't document "restrict" or "__restrict" in the man page. -- Craig Rodrigues http://www.gis.net/~craigr rodrigc@attbi.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021007150513.A11025>