From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 16:23:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57D0106566B for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:23:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6618FC08 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so784964gyg.13 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.57.9 with SMTP id f9mr3059359yba.341.1285258988518; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q17sm1142021ybk.5.2010.09.23.09.23.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seibercom.net (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: freebsd-ports.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92F13E54850 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:23:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:22:51 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100923122251.3a70f4ab@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <4C9B65A9.2060709@aldan.algebra.com> References: <201009201028.38559.david@vizion2000.net> <4C98DD7E.9000203@aldan.algebra.com> <20100922134505.GA4217@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <201009230914.16763.david@vizion2000.net> <4C9B65A9.2060709@aldan.algebra.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Ld81NaCJRKzf8gryuYJ4=RT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: ptlib build failure - breaks pwlib - hence also asterisk - opal - & openh323 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:23:09 -0000 --Sig_/Ld81NaCJRKzf8gryuYJ4=RT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:35:21 -0400 Mikhail T. articulated: > 23.09.2010 04:14, David Southwell =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0= =D0=B2(=D0=BB=D0=B0): > > > > > To OP (David Southwell): > > > > > Do you have openssl installed from ports (so it shows up in > > > pkg_info output)? > > > David, I think, it is much easier for you to answer the above simple=20 > question, than for the others to attempt the below experiment... > > > To port maintainers: > > > > > Could you try to build your ports in the presence of openssl > > > installed from ports? > > > > Have any maintainers tried this? > > > Not me... A few months ago, after upgrading to version 8/amd64 and installing OpenSSL from ports, I had several ports bomb out when I attempted to build them. I filed PR's against them and contacted the maintainers. It appeared that the majority of these port maintainers were not even aware that their port would not build in the presents of OpenSSL when it was installed via the ports tree. In any case, I was able to get them to fix their ports to build correctly. What amazed me is that this is such a common occurrence that it should have been contemplated when the port was released. Perhaps the Porters Handbook should list ports that have a corresponding base system counterpart; thereby, alerting the maintainer that he/she should test against both versions to insure full compatibility. Just my 2=C2=A2. --=20 Jerry =E2=9C=8C FreeBSD-Ports.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. =0D Derek Bok, president of Harvard --Sig_/Ld81NaCJRKzf8gryuYJ4=RT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMm37oAAoJEN3ZzwiLXOel19cH/iYUQJmp4Sdnw7Gp9hnMMX/p O4TlTeMWMlJ1EbuWzhNIf5zDU3g2urSQG97upybogBytY9I652EFbGhiDc7r0CNN w1WCYJ97Q+9KBtzeSQAaAz2v+PdWB5YdGPXwZRrtg0XoQ2En+URhNhN/864lN6Gb 92InelVOPQAZTCd9vV33ApdAMIKg3ymV+tXrD3G/5R2UQQuiZZIcvmVFrsWfp13J F0RBKHFhzCzjC6rHuwS2PIqo48BXM1phdWkE9QJFNrN0BEr32Nh+1Vkg+OXF74OB dRF7tqOEDISSMrUHgSxGlQapu0MnvDeKE69qKDMmuTwPzfjNrYQCmzrl2Nl5XCo= =Tjhi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Ld81NaCJRKzf8gryuYJ4=RT--