From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:05:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB6916A4CF; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:05:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3227443D2F; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:05:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CBA1FFDD8; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:05:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id A23AB1FFDD7; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:05:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 3415015384; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281DF15329; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:05:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:05:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek cc: FreeBSD current users cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Subject: Re: jail getfsstat patches. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:05:56 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > > +> do you have a 4.x version? > > > > I don't have 4.x boxes, so I can't prepare one for 4.x. Could you try to > > port it? It should be easy. > > I was looking at the original patch for 4.x (the one that is a kld > module). the one from pjd I think this is as I do not have an 4.x verison online. > here is my (I hope) fixed version... why do you work on this ? wouldn't backporting the actual patch be better instead of s.th. different ? there are of course some differences in both struct prison and statfs but it should be doable; making a KLD then is s.th. very simple from what I had learned. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT