From owner-cvs-all Tue May 28 11:33:52 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from kayak.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DD337B633; Tue, 28 May 2002 11:33:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by kayak.xcllnt.net (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g4SI5SJ60794; Tue, 28 May 2002 11:05:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@kayak.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g4SI5XTX000587; Tue, 28 May 2002 11:05:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g4SI5Xxv000586; Tue, 28 May 2002 11:05:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 11:05:33 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: "David O'Brien" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux_base Makefile distinfo.alpha distinfo.i386 pkg-plist.alpha pkg-plist.i386 Message-ID: <20020528180533.GA540@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <200205280235.g4S2ZPr85521@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020528040504.GB55559@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020528002336.A33431@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020528081154.GA86369@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020528081548.D33762@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020528173231.GC306@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020528104804.A60799@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020528104804.A60799@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:48:04AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:32:31AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > I see. So the objective I had ends up being less beneficial than deliberate > > breakages. > > When were you going to finish your objectives? The objective to not break existing ports was reached the moment I committed linux_base-7. It was up to the port maintainers to help shape the final result by upgrading their ports and give me feedback. > > Hmmm... I don't have a good solution for the implied problems, > > so that makes your approach probably the best. Although I must say that I'm > > disappointed to learn that we apparently need to break more eggs than we > > put in the omelet to get peoples attention. > > *sigh* when was someone else going to do something about this? My guess would be the moment you stop doing it. A wild one, I might add... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message