From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Mar 31 01:36:38 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA12526 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 31 Mar 1996 01:36:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu (cisco-ts10-line12.uoregon.edu [128.223.150.110]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA12521 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 1996 01:36:33 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dwhite@localhost) by riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id BAA01096; Sun, 31 Mar 1996 01:37:24 -0800 Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 01:37:24 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White Reply-To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu To: "Marc G. Fournier" cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BetaReport sent to XFree86.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 31 Mar 1996, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > I've submitted a bug report to the XFree team about the problem > I was talking about here (if anyone has any suggestions, I will try > them though). Could you refresh my memory on what is the card in question? I have a newer Mach64 and it is working great with 3.1.2B. (B as in bee, not D as in dog) ATI changed the Mach64s recently and they do not work with 3.1.2. I think they're called Mach64DTs or somesuch. > Chipset: Silicon Integrated Systems (chipset unknown) (PCI Probed) So these are the turkeys that made my motherboard: SiS :-) Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major