From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 13 00:19:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9753416A4CE for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:19:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rambo.401.cx (rambo.401.cx [80.65.205.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6461D43D39 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:19:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from listsub@401.cx) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (rocky [192.168.200.2]) by rambo.401.cx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1D0Jjha041067; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 01:19:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from listsub@401.cx) Message-ID: <420E9D7F.7040901@401.cx> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 01:21:19 +0100 From: "Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Farid Hajji References: <20050212223937.GB39237@fw.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20050212223937.GB39237@fw.farid-hajji.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0506-1, 2005-02-11), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pleasing both suits and the community (Logo Contest) X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:19:48 -0000 Farid Hajji wrote: [snipping a lot of text] > This way, the FreeBSD Project would be saved from being taken > over by people with a political agenda, and remain the excellent > technical development platform it has been since its creation. Why only the two extremes? I do not wish to "commercialize" FreeBSD. I would hate if that ever happened. And I do not want FreeBSD to be taken over by anyone, I fully trust and support the people that runs the project today. I simply can not see why an excellent technical development platform can not have an estethically pleasing logo and still be an excellent technical development platform? -- R